In its latest outsource report, the research and
advisory firm Gartner Inc. cites cost reduction as
the number one reason organizations choose to
outsource.3 Findings of a study by EquaTerra, a BPO
expert sourcing advisory firm, echoed that
conclusion when 56% of its pharmaceutical
respondents listed cost reduction as outsourcing’s
primary benefit. Coming in second (at 44%) was
improving stakeholder ROI by dedicating and
redirecting focus to more strategic activities.4 The
increased number of outsourced service providers
available to the life science C-suite is a testament
to the success of the model in achieving the
aforementioned goals. However, negotiating the
minefield of outsourcing providers and offerings -
and selecting the ones that will work best with an
organization - can be a daunting task. Manufacturers
considering outsource opportunities will gain a
competitive edge by thoroughly evaluating business,
financial and partnership considerations when
contemplating what and whether to outsource.
Section One - Business Considerations
Determining What to Outsource
In the
next five years, outsourcing in the pharmaceutical
segment will increase as companies are required to
focus on efficiency improvements to compete in
today's market. Companies are expected to take a
much more critical view of nearly all internal
operations – including those they have traditionally
managed and viewed as core to the organization.
Certain financial services, contract management and
order-to-cash processing are now all easily
outsourced as well. Customer Service and Medical
Affairs may also be effectively managed outside
company walls, depending upon the product line being
considered. It wasn't very long ago that commonly
outsourced activities, such as manufacturing,
clinical trial management and warehousing and
distribution, were considered core to the
organization and therefore remained "in-house.”
Using
core competency as the sole outsourcing “filter” has
proven to be a somewhat flawed model in recent years
as functions typically understood as “essential”
have been successfully outsourced with great
success. While core vs. non-core may in some cases
continue to serve as an appropriate filter when
determining what to outsource, it is just one of
many points of consideration life science
manufacturers may use to evaluate potential
outsourcing opportunities.
Consider the Following Potential Outsource
Evaluation Filters:
Non-Core: |
All non-core competency
functions /sub-functions should be evaluated
as outsource opportunities. |
Problem Areas: |
A function/sub-function
currently causing issues or problems for the
organization should be considered.
(Outsourcers may serve as effective change
agents) |
Subject Matter Experts: |
Rather than hiring highly
paid, underutilized experts, who are
difficult to find and easy to lose, consider
outsourcing to a team of experts, and pay
only for required services. |
Subsidiaries Considered for
Divestiture: |
To prepare in advance for the
sale of a business unit, outsource services
that are currently shared with or provided
by corporate. |
Expansions: |
Functional areas currently in
growth mode are advantaged by the immediate
scalability outsourcing affords. |
New Business Lines: |
Mitigate risk by contracting
out support services for new business lines
rather than burdening a new venture with
significant upfront capital investment and
heavy fixed cost. |
Market Uncertainty: |
Protect against the risk of
significant over or under investment caused
by rapid market changes, both favorable and
unfavorable. |
Industry Trends: |
Consider outsourcing
functional areas typically outsourced in the
industry – those your competitors have
chosen to outsource. |
Political Hotbeds: |
Outsource functions that have
or will draw negative attention to the
company (union issues etc…)
|
Complex Business Functions:
(Pain Points) |
Consider outsourcing
functional areas that require significant
staff, time and specialized computer systems
to administer. |
Scalability
Outsourcing allows manufacturers to scale up without
investing the time and money required to hire, train
and maintain staff and allows for immediate
reduction of services without requiring staff
elimination or maintaining excess physical assets
When considering a true outsource/in-house
scalability a comparison of direct and indirect
costs must be taken into consideration. For example,
call centers not only require labor and supervision,
but also occupancy, utilities, phone costs,
technology, training, etc. Fully utilizing an
in-house call center staff is difficult for any
company. By outsourcing a call center, a company
pays only for the time the service provider spends
making or taking the calls. Such end-to-end project
outsourcing provides ultimate scalability by
converting a fixed cost to a variable cost.
Expertise
When
considering outsourcing of a functional area
evaluate your current in-house staff by asking the
following questions:
-
Do
the internal personnel currently managing this
function require high salaries and benefits?
-
Do
they have specific expertise making them
difficult and expensive to train or replace?
-
Is
there adequate bench strength internally – a
backup for every position?
-
Is
the depth of management sufficient to manage the
functional area consistently and successfully?
-
Are
internal resources providing adequate service
levels?
-
Does this department have a track record of
continuous improvement?
-
Does the department have the resources to apply
best practice within this functional area?
-
Is
this department using the latest technological
advances?
-
Is
this department excelling in service
efficiencies that enhance customer
relationships?
As the
last of the baby boomers retire over the next 5 – 10
years, companies will lose a high percentage of
employees that hold the greatest depth of knowledge
and expertise. The resulting decreasing labor pool
will present a challenge for companies. Outsource
providers are staffed with highly specialized
personnel - providing access to a larger talent pool
and a sustainable source of skills. In addition,
outsourced services are provided under a legally
binding contract providing a clear accountability
advantage over internal services.
Section Two – Financial Considerations
Outsourcing - An Economic Value (EV) Boost
In the field of corporate finance, economic value (EV)
is a way to measure management’s ability to create
value for stakeholders. Economic value is defined as
company’s net operating profit after taxes minus a
capital charge for the investment on capital
employed in the business.
Economic value is positively impacted by
outsourcing’s method of cost reduction. By
outsourcing, EV is boosted by taking capital assets
off the books. According to Karl Pichler, an
associate at Stern Stewart -- the company that
conceptualized and trademarked the term economic
value added (EVA ) -- looking at outsourcing simply
as a technique to reduce capital costs is too narrow
a view, “Outsourcing is a key strategic component in
capital management," said Pichler. "Not so much to
avoid the capital charge, but more to make capital
variable and to reduce overall operating costs and
capital costs.”
Whether your financial metric is EV, return on
investment (ROI) or internal rate of return (IRR),
the strategic use of outsource partners can improve
the financial health of your company.
Cost Reduction Achieved through Shared Services
As life
science executives contemplate outsourcing options,
strong consideration should be given to the savings
achieved through shared services. In the shared
services outsource model, multiple companies within
the same industry are able to further increase
efficiencies and reduce costs by using third-party
providers, also referred to as shared-use
distribution providers.
To achieve optimum benefit from 3PL shared services,
it is important to utilize an industry specific
provider. The warehousing, tracking and distribution
of drugs, biotechnology products, and hazardous
materials requires Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
level compliance such as high-level security and the
use of pharmaceutical grade warehouses.
Perhaps
the most regulated of all industries, the life
science industry presents one of the most demanding
distribution and supply chain management challenges.
Regulatory requirements, the need for lot control
and quality assurance require 3PLs servicing the
life science market to create and maintain best
practice levels of accuracy, productivity and
efficiency. By sharing space in an FDA/DEA compliant
3PL facility and by outsourcing related I.T.
services and systems -- such as warehouse management
systems, contract management, order to cash and
accounts receivable -- 3PLs are able to spread costs
across multiple client manufacturers. As a result,
the overhead required for each client is lower and
start-up risks for new products are minimized.
Capital Outlay
Internal business units fight a continuous battle
for the resources necessary to keep pace with
changing technology and business standards set by
customers and regulatory agencies. Often, internal
groups don’t receive authorization for needed
capital investments until after a regulatory
observation has been made or a customer complaint
received.
Outsource companies are required to look at the
changing healthcare landscape and invest proactively
in best practice as a means of remaining
competitive. They are quick to adapt to changing
market demands and regulation and are able to spread
required investments across multiple client
companies. This aggregation eliminates the
redundancy and expense of each company building a
unique solution and ultimately removes cost for the
entire channel; companies may look to outsourcers as
a way to maintain a competitive base without
maintaining expensive infrastructure.
Carole Pfeil is the vice president of Corporate Communications, Dohmen Company. As the VP of Corporate Communications Carole works to positively position Dohmen, DDN and RESTAT in the eyes of key audiences — employees, clients/prospects, shareholders and local communities --through proactive public relations and publicity efforts. She has worked in communications capacities specifically in the Pharmacy and PBM spaces for more than 15 years. Prior to Avicom she was the Director of Business Development and Marketing for IHS, a unit of IMS Health, whose 8000-employee workforce supplies consulting, PBM auditing and business process outsourced services to the life science industry. Earlier experience includes rising from Technical Writer to Communications Specialist and then Manager of Communications and Public Affairs for Honeywell-Bull (Bull-HN) a French-owned company with a worldwide presence in more than 100 countries, particularly active in the health care and telecommunications sectors. She also works with DDN and RESTAT’s leadership and marketing teams to ensure branding consistency while creating dynamic internal and external communications tools to help inspire our workforce and reach our client and prospect audiences with compelling messages that extend our corporate vision. Recently she has completed a high level white paper on Outsourcing in the Life Science Industry. For article feedback you can contact the author at
Cpfeil@dohmen.com
|
|
|
|